The effectiveness of enteric-coated aspirin (EC-ASA) versus plain aspirin (P-ASA) in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke remains uncertain, particularly regarding aspirin responsiveness. In a prospective cohort study of 42 aspirin-naive patients with suspected or newly diagnosed ischemic stroke, no significant difference in aspirin non-responsiveness was observed between EC-ASA and P-ASA groups. However, diabetic patients (HbA1c > 6.5%) showed a higher risk of aspirin non-responsiveness. No gastrointestinal bleeding was reported in either group. These findings suggest that while EC-ASA may be as effective as P-ASA, a notable proportion of patients—especially those with diabetes—may exhibit reduced response to aspirin, warranting further research.
Select Content Type
Resources
Interests
Cardiology
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Endocrinology
ENT
Gastroenterology
Hematology
Immunology Allergy & Inflammation
Infectious Disease & Vaccines
Internal/Family Medicine
Neurology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Oncology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic
Pain & Anesthesiology
Pediatric Medicine
Psychiatry
Pulmonology
Radiology
Rheumatology
Surgery
Urology & Nephrology
Speciality
Cardiology
Dentistry
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Endocrinology
ENT
Gastroenterology
Geriatrics
Hematology
Immunology Allergy & Inflammation
Infectious Disease & Vaccines
Internal/Family Medicine
Medical Genetics
Neurology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Oncology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic
Pain & Anesthesiology
Pathology
Pediatric Medicine
Pharmacology
Psychiatry
Public Health
Pulmonology
Radiology
Rheumatology
Surgery
Urology & Nephrology
Thumbnail Image
Detail Image
Book Detail
Upload PDF
Impact of entric coating.pdf
(653.54 KB)
Actions
Download in App
Countries of release
India
Nigeria
UAE
IS_Ebsco
false
Description